Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Migration of unmigrated content due to installation of a new plugin

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Summary:

Traceroute from UTM to SLAC

...

sudo traceroute -I  www6.slac.stanford.edu (reached at its destination)

Traceroute from UTM Cisco border router to CERN

Image Added

Since this router can see cern in 10 hops there are no blocks for the first 10 UDP ports starting at 33434.  There may be blocks in higher number UDP ports that is unknown from this result.

Typically when one blocks a set of ports in an ACL one blocks them both for TCP and UDP.  If this is the case you may be able to use the telnet <cern-host> <tcp port command and see if you get a response as you increase the <tcp-port> starting at 33433  where <cern-host> = e513-e-rbx1-2-te20.cern.ch

You might also play around with the -p option in the traceroute command

Traceroute from UTM to CERN on a Mac

This gives the same result as on Linux. This is not unexpected since the Mac OS is Unix based and so uses UDP probes unlike Windows that uses ICMP probes and hence does not see the effect.

Possible Explanation

Traceroute uses UDP to send the requests (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Traceroute). The first request is sent to a particular port (33434), with a ttl  to tell it how many hops to go to.  The ttl starts at 1 is incremented as it tries the next hop, also the port is incremented (up to 33465).  It looks like the first few UDP ports are enabled and then they are blocked.  The blocking could be at your the border or in the ISP.  Can you try a traceroute from just outside the border (e.g. in the border router itself), or if you can get access to the routers try traceroute from them to the destination. Note Windows tracert uses ICMP and not UDP to send the probes and so should not suffer this problem.