Page History
...
Results with upgraded algorithm for pedestals calibration
Dark run 101 old vs new pedestals comparison
This is a demo of how user might be easily screwed up applying their own algorithm for pedestal calculation.
Five images of the raw-peds for the same 5-step dark run 101 were obtained by command like
lcls2/psana/psana/detector/test_01_epix10ka_raw_calib_image.py image -e ueddaq02 -d epixquad -r101 -Sraw-peds -J1 -K500 -N510 -g2 -M2 -o 2021-03-12-figs/r101-raw-peds-old-dark-ev0510-st2-gn2
then old constants were removed from DB with calibman
new constants were generated with new dark processing algorithm and similar images for new pedestals were generated:
lcls2/psana/psana/detector/test_01_epix10ka_raw_calib_image.py image -e ueddaq02 -d epixquad -r101 -Sraw-peds -J1 -K500 -N510 -g2 -M2 -o 2021-03-12-figs/r101-raw-peds-new-dark-ev0510-st2-gn2
Images of raw-peds in pairs for old and new constants for FH, FM, FL, AHL-H, and AML-M:
FH step 0
FM step 1
FL step2
AHL-H step3
AML-M step 4
Dark run 101 using pedestals from wrong gain range
Another demo of how user can be screwed-up using pedestals from wrong gain range.
lcls2/psana/psana/detector/test_01_epix10ka_raw_calib_image.py image -e ueddaq02 -d epixquad -r101 -Sraw-peds -J1 -K500 -N510 -g0 -M2 -o 2021-03-12-figs/r101-raw-peds-new-dark-ev0510-st2-gn0
raw(FL) - peds(FH)
lcls2/psana/psana/detector/test_01_epix10ka_raw_calib_image.py image -e ueddaq02 -d epixquad -r101 -Sraw-peds -J1 -K500 -N510 -g2 -M0 -o 2021-03-12-figs/r101-raw-peds-new-dark-ev0510-st1-gn2
raw(FH) - peds(FL)
Dark run 168 with single step in FL
...