Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Add comment on deadtime effect on normalization

...

View file
name20220428_ePixM_integ.pptx
height250

To

...

Do List

  • epixHR noise measurements vs. integration time (Dionisio will email out)
  • Longer term (months) epixM noise measurements vs. integration time
  • make sure not too much has to change for DAQ between integrating-mode and "normal" mode
    • camera shouldn't change
    • just have to switch between running a sequence and normal running
  • next meeting will not be held until we have noise measurements from both epixM and epixHR (waiting some months for new epixM hardware).

DAQ Timestamping Requirements

...

conclusion: feels like we should stick with original proposal


Normalization for Integrating Detectors

We typically accumulate shot-by-shot measurements of intensity from BLD, for instance, to use as normalization for the exposure of the integrating detectors.  Deadtime will sometimes result in the loss of some of the events that contribute to the integrated normalization.  How do we estimate this loss?  The XPM measures deadtime, but it is not added to the science data in any way.  One possibility is to capture the total deadtime (lost events/total events) at EndRun or EndStep.  Another possibility is to capture that number for a given trigger.  That could involve adding the deadtime numbers into the timing segment level, for instance, by modifying the XPM to broadcast those numbers on the timing stream.