...
These results prove that tri-lateration works. So the question is why is TULIP failing so miserably?
CBG multi-lateration vs CBG tri-lateration comparison
Spreadsheet here shows a comparison of error (in km) between CBG with multi-lateration and CBG with tri-lateration. I've just taken the first three landmarks from each target file. Upcoming updates will include the following:
- Sorting target lists on the basis of RTT to bring those landmarks at the top which have lowest RTT values.
- Avoiding duplicate landmarks.
- Avoiding landmarks present within a target's vicinity. This requires taking note of the location.
- Re-running the CBG code for new results.
- Populating the spreadsheet with new results.