Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • timing on LC, but still handled by BOS
  • networking might be on LC as well (unless 40Gb or 100Gb, which is natively MPO). NOT handled by BOS (also XTCAV point-to-point)
  • pgp is on MPO and handled by the BOS
  • detectors are all LC going to the BOS
  • BOS-to-208-patch-panel is MPO (via breakout cable) and some LC as described above
  • don't need breakout cables in SRCF according to Matt's proposal (wasteful of fibers between 208 and SRCF?)
  • try to use the SFP-to-QSFP-adapters (LC to MPO) as much as possible in SRCF

...

  • which fibers should be MPO vs LC?
    • only use MPO for fim's.
  • should we fanout timing at SRCF or put it through the bos? (related question: should camlink devices go through the bos?)
    • use the fanouts at SRCF for simplicity
    • should we fanout in 208?
    • maybe put camlink fiber data fibers through the bos?
  • routing mono-encoder udp network over to srcf
  • sharing xtcav between hutches with bos-switchable timing

...

  • tmo timing (including pvadet, bld) (LC to fanout)
  • rix timing (LC to fanout)
  • (4) tmo camlink nodes (LC, needs timing)
  • (2) rix camlink nodes (LC, needs timing)
  • tmo/rix fim node (5 fims) (MPO)
  • (2) rix hsd nodes (LC)
  • (7) tmo hsd nodes (LC)
  • peppex hsd node (LC)
  • (2) tmo/rix ami
  • (2) tmo/rix teb
  • (2) tmo/rix mebuser
  • xtcav (LC, needs timing)
  • mono-encoder (LC, needs timing)

inventory:

  • 27 nodes needed
  • shutdown 30
  • 3 broken (cmp006, 13, 15)