Page History

Hart, Philip Adam <philiph@slac.stanford.edu>
Thu 9/24/2020 11:52 AM
To: O'Grady, Paul Christopher
Cc: Dubrovin, Mikhail
I'm working in the data frame, except I've flattened the array for some reason.  So the standard bad behavior can be seen in module 6, pixel 7777 in my ntuple:
>>> 96*4
384
>>> 7777/384
20
>>> 7777%384
97

so [6, 20, 97] and all around there.
I see somewhat ok behavior in [14, 20, 97].
[2, 20, 97] and [10, 20, 97] seem plain ok.
[6, 4, 117] looks bad.  [2, 4, 117] seems ok.
[10, 218, 53] is pathological in a check-mark way.
[2, 286, 207] is pathological in a check-mark way.

- Philip