Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • News 
    . Write an email to Marco for a possible change of the experimental schedule.
  • Update on 2016 analysis:
    • Vertexing analysis, unblinded L1L1 - Matt S.    
      Matt will send the final results with systematics uncertainties to the committee. Expect to get results approved on Wednesday. Then a plot of OIL will be released to the collaboration meeting for approval. It will be used in the jeopardy document.
    • Resonance Search, final results - Rafo/Cameron
      No word from the committee yet
  • Status of 2019 MC/data comparison - Matt G. 
    Looks like the discrepancy between MC and data is run dependent, reverses the ratio for later runs. For now, will use MC as to be correct.
  • Reach estimate for 2019 (4.5 GeV)/2021 (3.8 GeV)/2.2 GeV - Cameron/Matt G./Omar 
  • Update on PAC and the jeopardy document - Stepan
    The 10 page limit requirement is strict, we may get 1-2 pages for the title (author list) and references but the document text and figures should be within 10 pages. 
    A proposed list of figures:
    1. Fig.1 (a) \epsilon^2 vs mass with 2015 (published) and 2016 resonance search, with all other experiments on it, the latest
      Fig.1 (b) \epsilon^2 vs mass with 2016 vertexing results (number of expected A's after the z-cutoptimum interval method), low \epsilon region
    2. Fig.2 (a) 2019 SVT rendering with mods
      Fig.2 (b) hodoscope
    3. Fig.3 (a) 2019 vertexing resolution vs mass
      Fig.3 (b) 2019 efficiency vs. z for long-lived A' at two masses
    4. Fig.4 (a) 2019 mass distribution after Esum cut 
      Fig.4 (b) 2019 Esum distribution overlayed MC, show 2 cluster events with different symbols
    5. Fig.5 Reach plot - expected reach from 2019 and projected reach for 2021 (3.7 GeV) with all others in Fig.1(a) 
  • aob