Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • It is over files 1,2
  • used denoise-log
  • adding file 4, with subbkg, reduced acc to 63%
  • adding file 4, without subbkg reduced acc to 48%

Third Pass 

Here we did better de-noising and compared to a signal processing approach. The de-noising is:

  • opencv medianBlur
    • yag: 5pt
    • vcc: 7pt
  • opencv guassianBlur
    • yag: 55 x 55
    • vcc: 15 x 15
  • lanczos reduction

After doing the de-noising, and before the reduction, we find the maximum value in the image and call it a hit if it is in the labeled box. This signal processing solution performs quite well. Over files 1,2,4 and doing the background subtraction for file 4, it does:

  • 100% for the yag
  • 99% for the vcc
    • one of the vcc boxes is mislabeled though
    • the other one, it is close to the box, the gaussian blur took a longer shape with some nearby noise and made it more round (we guess)

The regression pipeline does quite well on the yag, but less well on the vcc

  • yag: inter/union accuracies: th=0.50 acc=0.89 th=0.20 acc=0.97 th=0.01 acc=0.98

  • vcc: inter/union accuracies: th=0.50 acc=0.09 th=0.20 acc=0.38 th=0.01 acc=0.66

Here are plots

vcc median+Gaussian Blur

Image Added

yag median+Guassian Blur

 

Image Added