Introduction
In response to a reported performance problem between SSRL and ANL reported by Brian Kobilka's group, Phil Reese of Stanford campus looked at the perfSONAR Bwctl (iperf) plots shown below.
Stanford to ESnet at Sunnyvale | Denver/ESnet to Stanford | Chicago/Esnet to Stanford | ANL/ESnet to Stanford |
---|---|---|---|
| | | |
It is seen that as the distance from source to Destination increases, the asymmetry between the two directions also increases. This could be due to loss in one of the paths (the one to Stanford). Any loss can dramatically degrade performance. See for example:
...
...
...
- The
...
- following
...
- graph
...
- might
...
- be
...
- useful:
...
- it
...
- shows
...
- the
...
- random
...
- loss
...
- rate
...
- affect
...
- on
...
- tcp
...
- flavors
...
- across
...
- a
...
- dummynet
...
- on
...
- a
...
- 250mbps
...
- link
...
- (this
...
- was
...
- before
...
- gig-e
...
- was
...
- common
...
- place).
...
- 162ms.
...
- Single
...
- tcp
...
- flow.
...
- The
...
- full
...
- analysis
...
- available
...
- at
...
...
- (~pp152).
...
- warning:
...
- long
...
- and
...
- arduous
...
- content
...
- !
- Also see the ESnet presentation at TERENA 2013 , in particular slides 22 onwards
Seen from ANL
From Phil Reese:
Poking at the other end, I found another perfsonar at ANL collecting throughput traffic back toward the west cost. See anlborder-ps.it.anl.gov
...
and
...
look
...
at
...
the
...
throughput
...
graphs
...
available
...
there.
...
From
...
those,
...
it
...
seems
...
like
...
there
...
is
...
symmetry
...
to
...
Kansas
...
at
...
least
...
but
...
then
...
it
...
degrades
...
as
...
the
...
route
...
moves
...
further
...
west.
...
From
...
Stanford,
...
we
...
are
...
primarily
...
an
...
I2
...
site
...
but
...
it
...
looks
...
like
...
once
...
we
...
get
...
into
...
the
...
CENIC
...
world,
...
there
...
is
...
a
...
blending
...
of
...
routes
...
between
...
I2
...
and
...
ESnet.
...
Not
...
sure
...
if
...
that
...
is
...
a
...
problem
...
or
...
not.
...