Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Why are detector simulations needed?

  • optimize full detector designs for physics performance on benchmark processes
  • optimize subsystems, subdetectors
  • compare proposed detector technologies (in concert with test beam)
    • calorimeter examples - RPC, GEM, scintillator, Silicon, lead tungstate, hybrid
  • compare different full detector designs
  • compare MC for comparing Monte Carlo simulations with test beam results to better understand both
  • compare, test, and debug reconstruction and analysis algorithms
  • optimize design of subsystems, subdetectors
  • and other software
  • understand the understand role of dead material materials in affecting physics processesthe detector performance
  • model the understand effects of hardware inefficiencies such as cross-talk, dead cells, etc.
  • understand the effects of backgrounds
  • establish an infrastructure for the actual detector experiment(s)

...

There are now four proposed detector designs for the ILC which each having , each of which has an an outline document. These are the

...

  • (

...

  • SiD (American origin)
    • Silicon tracker, 5T field
    • SiW ECAL
    • 4 'coordinators' (2 Americans, 1 Asian, 1 European)
  • Large Detector Concept (LDC) (European origin)
    • TPC (+Silicon IT), 4T field
    • SiW ECAL ("medium" radius)
    • 6 'contact persons': (2 Americans, 2 Asians, 2 Europeans)
  • GLD (Asian origin)
    • TPC (+Large Silicon IT), 3T field
    • W/Scintillator ECAL ("large" radius)
    • 6 'contact persons': (2 Americans, 2 Asians, 2 Europeans)
  • fourth concept

(above based on slide from slide of Hitoshi Yamamoto)

What is the SiD?

...