changes.
| | h1. Information and discussions about LAT common interests with the TeV community |
| | |
| | {panel:title=Relevant VHE experiments|borderStyle=solid|borderColor=#ccc|titleBGColor=#F7D6C1|bgColor=#FFFFCE} |
| | |
| | {panel} |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | Name | Type || Ethresh (1) | |
| | | [H.E.S.S.|http://www.mpi-hd.mpg.de/hfm/HESS/HESS.html] | Imaging Atmospheric Cherenkov | 120 GeV | |
| | | [VERITAS-4|http://veritas.sao.arizona.edu/] | Imaging Atmospheric Cherenkov | 120 GeV | |
| | | [CANGAROOIII|http://icrhp9.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/] | Imaging Atmospheric Cherenkov | 500 GeV | |
| | | MILAGRO | Air Shower | 400 GeV - 40 TeV (2) | |
| | | [MAGIC|http://magic.mppmu.mpg.de/] | Imaging Atmospheric Cherenkov | 50 GeV | |
| | (1) We need to distinguish between anticipated threshold and achieved/documented threshold. Until then, be critical to any quoted number |
| | (2) The threshold/energy response of a ground array like Milagro cannot easily be compared to ACTs. This interval respresents the energy range over which 90% of events from a crab-like spectrum are detected. |
| | {panel:title=Experimental Issues|borderStyle=solid|borderColor=#ccc|titleBGColor=#F7D6C1|bgColor=#FFFFCE} |
| | |
| | {panel} |
| | |
| | |
| | h3. Optimizing variability studies |
| | |
| | | * Visibility tools |
| | | * Visibility tools [proposals and tools H.E.S.S.|http://www.mpi-hd.mpg.de/hfm/HESS/public/external.htm] |
| | * \* [Unified VHE visibility tool] |
| | * \* [LAT visibility tool] |
| | |
| | * Alerts/transients/scheduled observations |
| | * \* [VHE timetables] |
| | |
| | {panel:title=Analysis Issues|borderStyle=solid|borderColor=#ccc|titleBGColor=#F7D6C1|bgColor=#FFFFCE} |
| | |
| | {panel} |
| | |
| | |
| | h3. Spectral fitting tools |
| | |
| | * [Calibration] |
| | * [Response Functions] |
| | |
| | h3. VHE sources |
| | |
| | * [Galactic] |
| | * [Extragalactic] |
| | * [Variable] |
| | * [All] |
| | |
| | {panel:title=Collaboration & Policy Issues|borderStyle=solid|borderColor=#ccc|titleBGColor=#F7D6C1|bgColor=#FFFFCE} |
| | |
| | {panel} |
| | |
| | ["Wish List" for H.E.S.S.] |
| | |
| | |
| | The object of desire: What we ought to know about the facilities |
| | | Facility | Object visibility/constraints | Analysis technique/data products | Comments | |
| | | *template* | energetic threshold = f(dec); low threshold cuts readily available ? | shower reconstruction: which MC/version ? | | |
| | | | point source sensitivity = f(dec); public? generally applicable ? | high-level data product: gamma-ray excess-map - availability / conditions ? | | |
| | | | extended source sensitivity = f(source size); public ? generally applicable ? | high-level data product: gamma-ray excess-map - format (root/fits) ? | | |
| | | | energy resolution public? known dependencies ? | high-level data product: spectral data - availability / conditions ? | | |
| | | | angular resolution public ? known dependencies ? | high-level data product: spectral data - format (xspect/root/...) ? | | |
| | | | timeline: observational history : which objectes ? when? eff. exposure? result published ? | high-level data product: spectral fits - fit-function flexibility ? which uncertainties ? | | |
| | | | schedules: which objects ? when ? result will be made available when ? | intent of matching contemporaneous analysis ? when ? how ? | | |
| | | | | lc: minimal timescale ? flexibility in rebinning ? | | |
| | {panel:title=Conferences (presentations and proceedings)|borderStyle=solid|borderColor=#ccc|titleBGColor=#F7D6C1|bgColor=#FFFFCE} |
| | |
| | {panel} |
| | |
| | |
| | [Towards a Network of Atmospheric Cherenkov Detectors VII, April 2005, Paris|SCIGRPS:2005, April 27-29, Paris, Towards a Network of Atmospheric Cherenkov Detectors VII] |
| | |
| | h1. Meetings |
| | |
| | [Friday Nov 4 2005: GLAST, GRB and TeV observations|Friday Nov 4 2005] |
| | [Saturday Mar 4 2006: F2F meeting|Saturday March 4 2006] |
| | [Wednesday, June 14, 2006 (9am Pacific): VRVS meeting in Vela|Wed, June 14, 2006] |
| | |
| | h2. Whiteboard |
| | |
| | [A place to throw ideas] |