...
Our discussion pointed out some areas where typical build tools will not replace some portion of CMT, such as the cmt checkout from CVS which puts our code into our typical package structure. Toby suggested that we could retain CMT just for those little bits. The general consensus seems to be that getting rid of CMT entirely would be the best goal. Some of those CMT routines are already done in other ways within the RM and the NPMS. We should pay some attention to what functions we lose when discarding CMT and make sure we provide suitable mechanisms to reproduce them.
Followup to May 30 EVO Meeting (Jim Chiang, May 31, 2007)
I've looked into a couple of the items that came up during the meeting:
...